Wow! The last few weeks have been crazy! We performed at Marlowe Theatre Scratch Night in Canterbury and then went off to Kingston for our residency with Creative Youth at the International Youth Arts Festival. After three nights of work-in-progress performances, we want to share some images and audience feedback. 

More information will be posted here soon when we have completed our Arts Council Evaluation. 



FEEDBACK
Do you think that we dealt with the subject matter appropriately? Please explain.

"I felt it was very sensitively dealt with. Ted was portrayed beautifully with the right measures of humour and heart". 

"Yes, you seem to have a clear understanding of MND". 

"It’s crucial to highlight the positive attitude to an awful situation. You brought out Ted’s perseverance and positivity beautifully".

"Yes, I thought it was handled very delicately - it enlightened me to what MND is and what that could mean to someone".

Did the different styles of puppetry (full bodied Ted, the head and hand and the shadows) compliment or distract from the narrative? Please explain.


"Really enjoyed the variety. Thought some of the shadow puppetry was brilliant".


"Really enjoyed the variety. Thought some of the shadow puppetry was brilliant".


"Complemented, not sure whether they could blend better".


"Found the shadow puppetry stunning and very beautiful - perhaps the lighting behind was slightly too bright (could see the strings quite easily at times)". 


What do you think we could improve on?


"Some of the shadow figures could be slightly larger". 


"Ted’s relationships with his goldfish and lady were lovely, I almost wanted to see more of his story/narrative and less about the disease (which is still very relevant) I wanted to see more of Ted pre-MND to really connect with him".

"If there is a reason for all the little boxes for the props, make that clearer". 


"Transitions - make breathing a stylised choice and more of it to the music". 


"Explore the relationship between the couple more".

"Maybe we could find out more about the disease"?


"A tiny detail; when you are doing the puppeteering behind the screen it would be good to have your feet fully covered in black as not to distract the eye". 


Many thanks to all who share their thoughts and feedback. It has been greatly appreciated.

Sorry we have not updated our Blog for a while. We are knee deep in foam, paint, wood and glue! Here are a few images for you to show our process in our Faversham workshop and the rehearsal room. 

We have a lot to do, but we are excited for the up and coming performances at the International Youth Arts Festival!

Molly
When talking about Smoking Apples, people always ask me, so, are you in it? Or are you the director? Each time I hear this being asked, I’m always a little bit surprised and this is just because for me, devising requires you to be both. It requires you to be able to have the skills to show your ideas and deliver the goods in a performance but also go and mull over the heart, the soul, the point of what you are making. 

Now, I will be the first person to admit that this does not come without difficulties and during today’s rehearsal, I found myself wishing  that I could split into two people and have one rehearsing practically and one watching. This doesn’t happen very often but when it does it’s VERY annoying!

It all started as we tried to work our way into making the scientific process of MND clearer. From our scratch performances, we are aware that we used a rather simplified method of showing to audience our central character was being diagnosed with MND. This was purely down to time constraints and we felt as though, within the 10 minute time-frame we had, it was best to be as crystal clear as possible so that the audience were under no illusion that it was MND we were showing. Having reflected on this and although this served a purpose at the time, we were ready to move into a more subtle way of telling the audience about the process of MND.

At this current moment in time, there is no verbal text in our piece. This is not something that we have decided on for definite, it’s just that each time we try adding it in, it feels totally wrong and is therefore removed. Here, we have created another dilemma for ourselves. How do we go about showing the physical process of MND (some of which happens inside of the body) without speaking at all, without a doctor reciting exactly what it happening inside the body? This proved to be the most interesting exploration of our rehearsal today. We have been working around ideas of the external physical state caused by MND and the notion that this then inspires the internal mind, however, we had not practically explored yet the fact that the external physical is being caused by the internal physical and therefore, perhaps in order to provide clarity for the audience, they have to see that part too.

We have spent today working on a scene that shows what MND causes inside of the body. In between each of the thousands of neurones we have in our body, electrical impulses are transmitted. These carry the message from our brain to our body parts, allowing them to move in the way that we want them to. When someone has MND, those parts of the neurones that deliver and receive the impulses start to wither and the impulses can no longer reach their destination, therefore the communication between the brain and the body part breaks down eventually causing complete immobility.

I don’t want to ruin it for anyone who may come and see it (hopefully all of you reading) but I will say, at this point, it involves being in the dark, torches, lights and shadow play. Let’s see what everyone makes of it in our open rehearsal tomorrow!

Matt


With the scratches now past, this was our second of 2 days back in the workshop before rehearsals. The main aim was to work on the puppet, adjusting and re-designing parts that had been an issue or could be an improvement on our central character Ted.

Whilst Will worked on reshaping the hands and then covered them in reno-flex to give them extra strength and durability, I turned my attention to the detail of the head mechanism on Ted. Now that his character has been established, I could begin to work with a mechanism that both fitted my hand perfectly and also would allow me the control to create the puppet's head movements with ease. I had established that the old system of a central head rod, raised one issue: when the head turned left or right the body would also turn as it was attached to his lower body. After some pondering over design to solve this problem (it was in fact a keyring that gave me the idea) I decided to cut the rod and the lower half would now be attached to the body and the top half would be attached to the bottom half with a simple twisting mechanism,  which meant when the head turned left or right, only the head would move and not the entire upper body.

This work took up the best part of the day and the day was finished off with re attachibg the head, and tidying up the mechanism inside the head and body, so it was free in movement. It was little touches like adding candle wax to the slide bar which moves the head up and down, which will make the puppet fluid in movement and comfortable for the puppeteer to use.


Onto rehearsals tomorrow with our updated puppet, Ted. 

Carly

Gemma, our Dramaturg, came along to our scratch at The Blue Elephant. She forwarded us some great feedback to reflect on and start to work into our future rehearsals. 

We wanted to share a few of her thoughts with you:

• The piece was visually beautiful and moving, well done. Your puppetry is really sensitive which will really make this piece heart rending.
• I think the ten minutes were fairly clear in terms of an overarching ‘narrative’ which I know is of concern to you, however there can perhaps be clearer decisions on some of the detail...I think we may need to highlight more clearly some of the specific symptoms of MND so the diagnosis is not non-specific. I think the use of the text signs with the symptoms was perhaps a little clunky in this shorter version but I feel there is a way that the written signs and indeed the medical scans can be embedded in the piece stylistically.
• I left the piece wanting to know what made this character tick and hankered after a scene outside of home i.e. the train spotting or other activity.   
• I still feel the transfer into the ‘imagination’ is not clear enough...When the man was lifted into the air I did not really see a reason or motivation behind it, I know this is something we have talked about before – we need to establish why ‘pre-diagnosis’ he reverts into his imagination and how this changes ‘post-diagnosis’ throughout the progression of the illness. What is the trigger – boredom, anger, frustration, pain? Why do we daydream anyway? For what purpose? 

Food for thought and a somewhere to start with rehearsals again next week.

Matt
So...here we are then, our second Scratch in one week. This morning, we all arrive at the Battersea Arts Centre (BAC) for our 11am tech rehearsal.The stage is smaller than expected so after a quick 20 minutes tech we are off to rehearse in Kingston.

Firstly we tape the floor in the rehearsal room to the size of the BAC's stage, and start running through our 10 minute section to get use to the stage size.

On Wednesday we made a list of things we wanted to refine after the Blue Elephant scratch. So we made our way through the list, refining little details. One example of this is in the diagnosis scene, adding in Ted (we have now named the puppet) reading a health leaflet, while the doctors/ensemble pull out x-rays and scans around him. We decided to take our time in the imagination sequence, looking at where the puppeteer stands so as to not block the puppet, to making minute details like the head making subtle movements.

After rehearsal we are back off to the BAC, we are last in the evening's running order and so get the opportunity to watch other pieces, which was a welcomed break to our busy week. After performing, we collect our feedback and have the chance to speak to some people.  The feedback below reflects the audiences thoughts and feelings:

"Beautiful. Absolutely charming puppetry. Genuinely moving."

 "Needs music for paper flying about...otherwise promising piece."


"Beautiful and heart-breakingly emotional. My Grandad is currently undergoing similar trauma and is was almost agonising to watch, you really made me feel for the puppet. Huge opportunity of emotionally touching many people. Keep up the awesome work."

Molly
Last night I went to sleep feeling incredibly humbled and overwhelmed by the comments and feedback from our first scratch of CELL at the Blue Elephant Theatre, Camberwell. As with all scratches, the emphasis is on the experimentation and testing of new ideas in front of a supportive audience but as a performer, there is always something incredibly nerve-wracking about doing this. However, the positives of gaining constructive feedback that can be used in future rehearsals, massively outweighs this.

There were a number of surprises in terms of the audience reactions at the Blue Elephant which made us reassess the potential of each section we have created so far. The first surprise was the comedic value of the scene with Ted and the fish. The audience found it very humorous and took a particular liking to the fish with many comments about how much they enjoyed this little character. This was the first moment we presented and I wonder if the humour came from seeing an initial animation or whether it was because the audience could easily relate to the relationship between Ted and the fish.

During our process so far and in our journey to make our 10 minute scratch performance, we made the choice to create a mini piece rather than a 10 minute extract of a longer show. This was because we wanted to see if we could show the physical degeneration of Ted and whether this would come across clearly, due to a disease or whether it might be mistaken as old age. Some of the audience from the Blue Elephant said that it looked like a story of old age and some commented that it looked like a physically degerative disease so, therefore, we spent much of our rehearsal today exploring way of making this clearer. We wanted to change this today so that we can try a new approach in front of the audience at the BAC tomorrow night. We tried to focus in sharpening the diagnosis section and using brain scans and pictures of neurones to allude to MND without saying it. At this stage, we don’t want to categorise Ted as having MND but i’m sure there will come a point where we do, most likely in our longer version of CELL.

I’m intrigued, excited and once again feeling nervous about presenting our scratch at the BAC tomorrow, let’s see what the day brings...

Carly
Well, what a day. The morning was spent trying to finish our building jobs. When we met at the Rose Theatre at 1.30pm, we had a puppet body, a table, a chair and importantly, a puppet head which we are feeling pretty pleased with.

The rest of the afternoon was spent addressing problems and issues we had with the puppet itself and how we would use it on Tuesday at the scratch. There was a lot of deliberation, running around Primark, BHS and M&S, foam cutting and coffee drinking, but we got there in the end with a long to-do list and left the building at 7pm to go away and do our tasks. We reconvene tomorrow at 10am where I will lead a practical session until 3pm with our work-in-progress puppet.